Re: [PATCH] add scheduler domains for ia64

From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes_at_engr.sgi.com>
Date: 2004-08-18 06:57:32
On Saturday, August 14, 2004 8:54 pm, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Yeah, all the SD_*_INIT values are overridable. We could even say, put
> in an SD_NODE2_INIT for a 2nd level NUMA domain in the generic code,
> for example.

Yeah, we'll need different values for each level in the hierarchy.

> I'd say your closest-node setup would probably get close to what you want.
> The main thing you want is to not do huge amounts of balancing work in
> interrupt context, and also not to move a task from one side of the
> system to the other when one node is a little bit out of balance.
>
> I guess if you want to do anything fancier then we can take a look at
> re-exporting the domain setup.

Ok, sounds good.  How does this look?  It sits on top of 2.6.8.1-mm1, ripping 
out the ia64 specific bits and moving things to sched.c.  I've also added an 
ia64 specific SD_NODE_INIT and an #if !defined to sched.c

Jesse

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Received on Tue Aug 17 17:03:26 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:29 EST