Re: Altix I/O code reorganization - 14 of 21

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch_at_infradead.org>
Date: 2004-08-12 19:20:09
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 06:33:22PM -0500, Pat Gefre wrote:
> > 007-io-hub-provider:
> >    tio_provider and hub_provider have exactly the same methods, no need to
> >    keep the xtalk_provider_t abstraction at all
> > 
> 
> The abstraction was done for future expansion.  We have removed it 
> and in the future if we do need to abstract these 2 providers, we will 
> submit another patch.

> +xtalk_provider_t hub_provider = {
> +
> +	(xtalk_intr_alloc_f *) sal_xtalk_intr_alloc,
> +	(xtalk_intr_free_f *) sal_xtalk_intr_free,
> +
> +};
> +
> +xtalk_provider_t tio_provider = {
> +
> +	(xtalk_intr_alloc_f *) sal_xtalk_intr_alloc,
> +	(xtalk_intr_free_f *) sal_xtalk_intr_free,
> +
> +};

you still have it in this patch.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Thu Aug 12 05:23:55 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:29 EST