On Monday 26 April 2004 3:12 pm, David Mosberger wrote: > I do think that iosapic_enable_intr() is > misnamed now that it actually leaves the interrupt _masked_. What > it's really doing now is that it asserts that the I/O SAPIC routine is > programmed to a correct/working value. It would be good to fix that > when changing the corresponding code in drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c. IIRC, > Bjorn already has patches which touch on that file. If so, could you > do a rename at the same time, Bjorn? Sure, I'll take a look at that. I think the only interface between acpi/pci_irq.c and the architecture code will be acpi_register_gsi(), though, so renaming iosapic_enable_intr() should be independent of those changes. Bjorn - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Tue Apr 27 10:39:05 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:25 EST