On Tuesday 06 April 2004 5:18 pm, David Mosberger wrote: > I don't like this patch at all. The #defines to > unsupported_isa_dma_interface() turn compile-time errors into > potential runtime errors. With a properly abstracted interface, the > ISA-compatibility-macros should not lead to any code in ISA-free > systems (and hence there would be no possibility of runtime errors). True. I actually started by modifying drivers to use CONFIG_ISA to determine whether to use ISA interfaces, but (a) that leads to a lot of changes, most of which I can't test and have the potential to break other arches, and (b) somebody suggested that ISA is sort of a special case because it hasn't been converted to the driver model. But I certainly agree that it would be a lot cleaner. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Wed Apr 7 11:12:17 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:25 EST