Hi, I've already sent this mail, but receiving no feedback, I try again (sorry for people who don't feel concerned by that stuff). I'd like to report what I estimate a potential bug in the INIT management (at the present time I don't know exactly what the origin of this problem is). Testing the "dump" button on a 4-way Itanium-2 machine equipped with a SAL 3.0, I've noticed a not-inline with SAL specifications behaviour. Indeed, in the "ia64_mca_init" function (in arch/ia64/kernel/mca.c file) we register the functions "ia64_monarch_init_handler" and "ia64_slave_init_handler". Then I push on the "dump" button that generates an INIT interruption to all the processors. This signal is then caught by PAL, and SAL which calls (with a reason [register GR11] equal to 2) "ia64_monarch_init_handler" on the monarch processor and "ia64_slave_init_handler" on the slave ones (to this point, I hope to be right, isn't it ?). What I've noticed using traces (and further an ITP tool) is that for each processor the "ia64_monarch_init_handler" is ever called. :-( Could someone tell me if he already has encountered this problem or if it is an expected behavior ? For information, I've done the same test with a 16-way Itanium-2 machine with a SAL 3.1 and the result is exactly the same. Thanks for your help. Best regards, Francois WELLENREITER - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Tue Mar 30 02:02:56 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:25 EST