My apologies. I misunderstood. If one is going to use the results of the Intel compiler, that appears to be fine. I read into this that the idea was to include the Intel compilers themselves in something to be redistributed. On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 18:57, Duraid Madina wrote: > Really? I don't see this in 'clicense', indeed it looks like they are > specifically allowing this. Am I missing something? > > "Any work performed or produced as a result of use of the Materials > cannot be performed or produced for the benefit of other parties for a > fee, compensation or any other reimbursement or remuneration." seems to > be the relevant section of the license. > > > Duraid > > Al Stone wrote: > > Um, I hate to throw a damper on this party, but the > > Intel compiler license specifically prohibits this > > sort of redistribution. Intel's legal folks would > > have to provide gelato some mechanism for this to > > work. > > -- Ciao, al ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Al Stone Alter Ego: Linux & Open Source Lab Debian Developer Hewlett-Packard Company http://www.debian.org E-mail: ahs3@fc.hp.com ahs3@debian.org ---------------------------------------------------------------------- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Mon Mar 29 22:59:31 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:25 EST