Re: should ia64_spinlock_contention do backoff?

From: Chris Wedgwood <>
Date: 2004-03-27 10:41:10
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 09:16:52AM -0800, wrote:

> We have 4-way Itanium2 systems here.  Is that large enough for
> testing?

It depends on the level of lock contention and what the remote memory
latency is (well, essentially how quickly you can bounce cachelines
about).  As other people have mentioned SGI has tested this on much
larger configurations without seeing much incentive to use it.

As a general principal I think getting lock contention down is more
worthwhile (but very much harder usually).

Does anyone have any idea what locks are most heavily contented for
ia64 right now?  John?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Received on Fri Mar 26 18:43:21 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:24 EST