RE: add lowpower_idle sysctl

From: Chen, Kenneth W <kenneth.w.chen_at_intel.com>
Date: 2004-03-26 06:20:58
>>>>> Todd Poynor wrote on Thu, March 18, 2004 3:00 PM
> I'd vote for using Patrick Mochel's PM subsystem and use a standard
> set of identifiers that are mapped to a platform-specific idle behavior,
> in  much the same way as platform suspend modes are handled today.  For
> example, strings echoed to /sys/power/idle could be an interface.  If
> folks are amenable to this I'd be happy to supply a (generic) patch for it.

Just wondering what is the state of development for this new PM scheme?
I don't check LKML that frequently, sorry if I miss any posting on LKML.

- Ken


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Thu Mar 25 14:22:03 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:24 EST