RE: [PATCH] fix PCI interrupt setting for ia64

From: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji_at_jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: 2004-03-08 21:42:53
Hi,

As a matter of fact, I don't have special reason to leave RTEs unmasked in
iosapic_register_intr(), iosapic_register_platform_intr(),
iosapic_override_isa_irq().
I think it is better that interrupts are unmasked by individual device
drivers, but
there are some exceptions. For example, PMI and INIT don't need device
drivers.
So I think more investigation is needed about them.

Regards,
Kenji Kaneshige

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Liu, Benjamin [mailto:benjamin.liu@intel.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 6:15 PM
> To: Kenji Kaneshige; linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] fix PCI interrupt setting for ia64
>
>
> Thank you for the information, Kenji. But is there any reason to
> leave it unmasked in iosapic_register_intr(),
> iosapic_register_platform_intr(), iosapic_override_isa_irq(),
> given the fact that they would be unmasked finally in individual
> device drivers?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Mon Mar 8 05:39:46 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:24 EST