Re: [PATCH] 2.4.25: BUG(): Use guard page instead of page 0

On Thursday 04 March 2004 4:41 pm, Keith Owens wrote:
> Why not use 'break 0' for gcc < 3.1?  No need to worry about which
> pages are protected.
> 
>         switch (break_num) {
>               case 0: /* unknown error (used by GCC for __builtin_abort()) */
>                 die_if_kernel("bugcheck!", regs, break_num);

Sounds reasonable to me, but I'm too chicken.  Propose a patch and
get David to take it, and I'll put it in 2.4.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html