Re: [PATCH] more robust halt_light

From: Jesse Barnes <>
Date: 2004-03-04 09:56:06
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 02:45:11PM -0800, David Mosberger wrote:
> Can we get rid of the CONFIG option too?  Or do folks who care (too?)
> much about wake-up latency prefer to turn off a CONFIG option over
> booting with nohlt?

Some people have come to me concerned about the wakeup latency of having
the halt call in there, and it also looks like the PAL has a bug on our
platform that causes hangs when we call PAL_HALT_LIGHT (which we're
tracking down), so I wouldn't mind if the config option stuck around a
little longer (or was a boot time parameter at least).

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Received on Wed Mar 3 18:04:28 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:24 EST