Is this the same box as the 2.6.4-rc1 test? I guess not -- the "Lion 2.6.4-rc1" test claims this: > ACPI: XSDT (v001 INTEL SR870BN4 0x01072002 MSFT 0x00010013) @ 0x000000003ff83090 Which looks like an 870-based box (Tiger, maybe)? This one ("Lion 2.6.4-mm2") looks 460-based: > ACPI: XSDT (v001 INTEL SR460AC 0x00000003 MSFT 0x0100000a) @ 0x000000005fe96658 > 4 CPUs available, 8 CPUs total So 4 of the 8 CPUs are disabled. Is that what you expect? > ACPI: LSAPIC (acpi_id[0x01] lsapic_id[0x01] lsapic_eid[0x00] enabled) > CPU 1 (0x0100) enabled > CPU 1: base freq=133.333MHz, ITC ratio=12/2, ITC freq=800.003MHz+/--1ppm > Calibrating delay loop... 797.80 BogoMIPS > CPU 1: synchronized ITC with CPU 0 (last diff 0 cycles, maxerr 551 cycles) Hmm... We still print 5 lines per CPU (tons better than it used to be), but we have no indication of what processor model it is. That seems more useful than some of this stuff. > pci_irq-0302 [03] acpi_pci_irq_derive : Unable to derive IRQ for device 0000:00:03.3 > ACPI: No IRQ known for interrupt pin B of device 0000:00:03.3 Ah, here's our friend the SMBus device. No USB funnies in this boot. I guess that's probably due to the fact that this really isn't the same box as the 2.6.4-rc1 boot. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Wed Mar 3 11:35:36 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:24 EST