On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 03:02:06PM -0800, David Mosberger wrote: > >>>>> On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 22:42:15 +0000, Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org> said: > > Matthew> I actually can't find a name for the ?: operator in the C > Matthew> FAQ. > > conditional expression? I remembered I had a copy of the C99 spec ... 6.5.15 calls it the "conditional operator". I also found a document calling it the "ternary operator". > I'd really prefer sal_revision() combined with a SAL_VERSION() macro. > I can just look at that and intuitively understand what it's doing > (especially given the symmetry with the LINUX_VERSION macros), whereas > with the sal_version_check() function, I have to go look at it's > definition. Okey dokey, done. I'll send it as a separate message to keep the ?:??! discussion out of the changelog ;-) -- "Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception." -- Mark Twain - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Mon Mar 1 11:06:26 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:23 EST