Re: [patch] 2.6.3 sync unwind code with 2.4.25

From: David Mosberger <>
Date: 2004-02-24 10:09:38
>>>>> On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:47:40 -0800, David Mosberger <> said:

  >>> Sorry, but I just don't see why there should be KDB-stuff in unwind.c
  >>> when KDB isn't part of the official Linux tree.

  Keith> You took the same patch for unwind.c in the 2.4 kernel.

  David> Well, that was 2.4.  I don't recall the details, but like I said, I
  David> don't see a good reason for including KDB patches in the default
  David> kernel when KDB isn't part of it.

In case it wasn't clear: if you want things to be in sync, I'd rather
ask Bjorn to remove the KDB portions in unwind.c.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Received on Mon Feb 23 18:12:21 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:22 EST