>>>>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:52:03 -0800, john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com> said: John> Unfortunately there is no replicated clock on this hardware, John> so all nodes access the first counter on the first node. Not John> great, but correct and slow is better then fast and wrong. OK, thanks for the info. I'll try to keep this in mind should there be timestamping questions again (as there was recently in the scheduler). >>>>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:49:44 -0800, john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com> said: John> Gah! Where is this trailing whitespace? I already deleted the whitespace (my editor is showing it in bright red, so it's kind a hard to ignore ;-). John> I went through this patch specifically eliminating any I could John> find. Perhaps my mail client is trying to irritate me. The whitespace wasn't systematic, so i doubt it was the mailer. Any chance the mail contained an old patch? John> The code, while similar, isn't quite shareable w/ John> ia32. However, I'd be up for moving it to a separate IBM John> directory if you'd prefer, although for just a single file it John> seems like overkill. I don't feel very strongly about it. If you expect there to be other IBM-platform specific files in the future, it would make sense to create an ibm subdirectory. It's really your call. --david - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Wed Feb 18 20:08:09 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:22 EST