Eric, I think I found a bug in the version 3.00.02 mpt driver that's currently in Linus' 2.6 tree (latest linux-2.5). Here's the code snippet: message/fusion/mptbase.c: PrimeIocFifos() ... if (sizeof(dma_addr_t) == sizeof(u64)) { /* Check: upper 32-bits of the request and reply frame * physical addresses must be the same. */ if (((u64)ioc->req_frames_dma >> 32) != ((u64)ioc->reply_frames_dma >> 32)){ goto out_fail; } req_frames_dma and reply_frames_dma are aligned version of dma addresses retrieved via two separate pci_alloc_consistent() calls. The mpt driver sets a 64bit consistent dma mask. How is it reasonable to assume two separate mappings will fall within the same 4GB chunk of memory? I recently added support for consistent mapping bypass in the sba_iommu driver for the ia64 zx1 chipset. Randomly on bootup, the MPT driver fails. Checking the mappings, I get a things like this: mptbase: Initiating ioc0 bringup ioc0: 53C1030: Capabilities={Initiator} sba_alloc_coherent() bypassing, dma_handle: 0x1fffb8000, addr: 0xe0000001fffb8000 sba_alloc_coherent() bypassing, dma_handle: 0x40ffcd8000, addr: 0xe0000040ffcd8000 PrimeIocFifos() req_frames_dma: 0x40ffcd8000, reply_frames_dma: 0x1fffb8000 mptbase: WARNING - ioc0 did not initialize properly! (-3) These are two perfectly valid consistent mappings as far as the platform code is concerned. I think mpt really needs to either set a 32bit consistent map of do a single allocation when it requires this type of thing. Thanks, Alex -- Alex Williamson HP Linux & Open Source Lab - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Fri Feb 13 11:21:17 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:22 EST