Re: [RFC][PATCH] linux-2.6.3-rc2_ia64-cyclone_A0

From: David Mosberger <davidm_at_napali.hpl.hp.com>
Date: 2004-02-13 13:07:58
>>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 17:41:44 -0800, Chris McDermott <lcm@us.ibm.com> said:

  Chris> The x450/x455 doesn't set/implement the SAL ITC drift
  Chris> bit. Could you point us to where this is documentated?  The
  Chris> latest SAL spec (Dec 2003) didn't have reference to this flag
  Chris> being implemented in the Platform Features Descriptor Entry
  Chris> in the SST.

Hmmh, you're right: I don't see it either in the public documentation.
I got confirmation from Intel on 8 Nov 2001 that bit 3 of the
platform-feature vector will be defined as the ITC_DRIFT bit and the
SAL documentation was supposed to have been updated Q1 2002.  Looks to
me like something got lost along the way.  Can someone from Intel
clarify?

	--david
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Thu Feb 12 21:16:14 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:22 EST