Re: [RFC][PATCH] linux-2.6.3-rc2_ia64-cyclone_A0

From: David Mosberger <>
Date: 2004-02-13 13:07:58
>>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 17:41:44 -0800, Chris McDermott <> said:

  Chris> The x450/x455 doesn't set/implement the SAL ITC drift
  Chris> bit. Could you point us to where this is documentated?  The
  Chris> latest SAL spec (Dec 2003) didn't have reference to this flag
  Chris> being implemented in the Platform Features Descriptor Entry
  Chris> in the SST.

Hmmh, you're right: I don't see it either in the public documentation.
I got confirmation from Intel on 8 Nov 2001 that bit 3 of the
platform-feature vector will be defined as the ITC_DRIFT bit and the
SAL documentation was supposed to have been updated Q1 2002.  Looks to
me like something got lost along the way.  Can someone from Intel

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Received on Thu Feb 12 21:16:14 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:22 EST