Re: gcc problems

From: Andrew Morton <akpm_at_osdl.org>
Date: 2004-02-07 03:30:50
Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> wrote:
>
> The fields were named differently in old versions of glibc, but the whole
>  layout didn't change in any way.
> 
>  -  unsigned long int sc_rsvd[16];/* reserved for future use */
>  +  unsigned long int sc_rbs_base;/* NULL or new base of sighandler's rbs */
>  +  unsigned long int sc_loadrs;	/* see description above */
>  +  unsigned long int sc_ar25;	/* cmp8xchg16 uses this */
>  +  unsigned long int sc_ar26;	/* rsvd for scratch use */
>  +  unsigned long int sc_rsvd[12];/* reserved for future use */
> 
>  > The easiest workaround is probably to install libunwind on your system
> 
>  The right fix is not to use a 2 years old glibc.

That's not very old.  One shouldn't have to upgrade libc just to build gcc?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Fri Feb 6 11:29:11 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:22 EST