Re: [RFC/PATCH, 1/4] readX_check() performance evaluation

From: David Mosberger <davidm_at_napali.hpl.hp.com>
Date: 2004-01-29 06:48:05
>>>>> On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 20:39:15 +0100, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> said:

  >> Yet they are a good indicator that something is wrong (not performing
  >> properly) or may be failing soon.  I don't think putting on blinders
  >> for such problems is a good idea.  Though I agree that the question of

  Andi> Most server class hardware should log it somewhere and allow
  Andi> to read the event log in the firmware. This even works for
  Andi> unhandleable errors unlike what the OS could do.

And you'd want to reboot your server just so you can check on the soft
failure rate? ;-)

	--david
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Wed Jan 28 14:55:42 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:21 EST