>>>>> On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 12:41:10 -0500, "Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com> said: Len> Bjorn, >> irq = acpi_irq_to_vector(irq); Len> Yeah, this name is totally bogus; and your comments are Len> absolutely right. I thank you for taking the time to address Len> it. Len> When I first saw this I said to myself, "hmm, shouldn't it be Len> acpi_irq_to_irq()?", nah, that seems even more stupid!";-) Len> Looks like this is only used for the SCI listed in the FADT. Len> So maybe we should just call it something like Len> acpi_fadt_sci_to_irq()? It would be good to come up with a consistent naming scheme. I/we tried to do that in the ia64/iosapic.c, but it might need some updating/revising with recent changes (such as MSIs). Perhaps "gsi" is also a contender for the ACPI interrupts. --david - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Thu Jan 22 14:14:19 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:21 EST