Re: [RFC][PATCH] 2.6.0-test11 sched_clock() broken for "drifty ITC"

From: Ingo Molnar <mingo_at_elte.hu>
Date: 2003-12-21 03:36:28
* Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au> wrote:

> I'm just thinking that computers with unsynched clocks have less need
> for good interactivity, but thats probably too narrow and x86 a view
> anyway.

it's also a matter of predictable behavior. The scheduler should not
behave differently just because there's no synchronized clock. 
Behavioral forks like that tend to come back and cause trouble later.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Sat Dec 20 11:37:28 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:21 EST