Re: [RFC][PATCH] 2.6.0-test11 sched_clock() broken for "drifty ITC"

From: Andrew Morton <akpm_at_osdl.org>
Date: 2003-12-21 02:05:32
Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> >
> >So i believe the generic relaxing of sched_clock() synchronization is
> >the right thing to do. I like your patch. It adds minimal overhead and
> >solves a hard problem - nice work! Andrew, please apply it.
> >
> >
> 
> Its a great looking patch if you must have high res sched_clock. So
> I guess I agree with it.

miaow ;)

> Can we have a scheduler day when Andrew is ready to take patches for
> it? I have a few small changes that I'd like to get merged soon too
> (not sched domains - that should probably go to the mm tree for a while)
> 
> Relevant patches are
> sched-ctx-count-preempt.patch
> sched-fork-cleanup.patch
> sched-migrate-comment.patch
> sched-style.patch
> sched-migrate-affinity-race.patch
> 

Post 'em.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Sat Dec 20 10:05:48 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:21 EST