Re: [RFC][PATCH] 2.6.0-test11 sched_clock() broken for "drifty ITC"

From: Nick Piggin <piggin_at_cyberone.com.au>
Date: 2003-12-21 01:57:09
Ingo Molnar wrote:

>
>So i believe the generic relaxing of sched_clock() synchronization is
>the right thing to do. I like your patch. It adds minimal overhead and
>solves a hard problem - nice work! Andrew, please apply it.
>
>

Its a great looking patch if you must have high res sched_clock. So
I guess I agree with it.

Can we have a scheduler day when Andrew is ready to take patches for
it? I have a few small changes that I'd like to get merged soon too
(not sched domains - that should probably go to the mm tree for a while)

Relevant patches are
sched-ctx-count-preempt.patch
sched-fork-cleanup.patch
sched-migrate-comment.patch
sched-style.patch
sched-migrate-affinity-race.patch



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Sat Dec 20 09:57:31 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:21 EST