On Tuesday 16 December 2003 5:17 am, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 05:37:35PM +0800, Yu, Luming wrote: > > Could you let me see what are you patch doing. > > I haven't seen Bjorn's patch yet, but it'll be something like: > > --- arch/ia64/pci/pci.c 12 Aug 2003 19:10:49 -0000 1.3 > +++ arch/ia64/pci/pci.c 16 Dec 2003 12:13:53 -0000 > @@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ alloc_resource (char *name, struct resou > res->end = end; > res->flags = flags; > > - if (request_resource(root, res)) > + if (insert_resource(root, res)) > return -EBUSY; > > return 0; Yup, that's exactly the patch. And I agree with Matthew about preferring this over your patch. Did you look at /proc/iomem with and without your patch? The value of keeping the request_resource() (or insert_resource()) should be obvious. Bjorn - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Tue Dec 16 11:23:48 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:21 EST