Re: [PATCH] - kernel profiler & spinlock_contention

From: David Mosberger <>
Date: 2003-11-27 04:31:02
>>>>> On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 09:23:10 -0600, Jack Steiner <> said:

  Jack> Profiling is more useful if addresses in spinlock_contention
  Jack> were attributed to the caller of spinlock_contention.

Execuse the language, but I'm reading:

	my tools suck so let's make the kernel suck!

Let's defer this discussion until next week, when I had a chance to
release my profiling tool.  I think you'll then agree that it's much
better to leave the code as is.  In fact, we should also have an
out-of-line contention handler for the read/write locks.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Received on Wed Nov 26 12:36:01 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:20 EST