Re: [PATCH] remove unimplemented syscalls noise

From: David Mosberger <davidm_at_napali.hpl.hp.com>
Date: 2003-11-20 08:31:55
>>>>> On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 13:21:07 -0800, David Mosberger <davidm@linux.hpl.hp.com> said:

  >> Having said that, I now realize that there is a problem:
  >> ia64_ni_syscall() is/was intended for syscalls that were supposed
  >> to be implemented but were missing for some reason.  Everything
  >> else should be handled by sys_ni_syscall.  There are no such
  >> syscalls anymore, so I think what we should do is change entry.S
  >> from using ia64_ni_syscall to sys_ni_syscall (and if there are no
  >> callers of ia64_ni_syscall left, delete it).  Want to send a
  >> patch?

Actually, in the interest of keeping the patch small, it's better to
remove the printk message in ia64_ni_syscall() for 2.6.0 and then we
can do the proper cleanup for 2.6.1.

	--david
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Wed Nov 19 16:36:02 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:20 EST