>>>>> On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 13:21:07 -0800, David Mosberger <davidm@linux.hpl.hp.com> said: >> Having said that, I now realize that there is a problem: >> ia64_ni_syscall() is/was intended for syscalls that were supposed >> to be implemented but were missing for some reason. Everything >> else should be handled by sys_ni_syscall. There are no such >> syscalls anymore, so I think what we should do is change entry.S >> from using ia64_ni_syscall to sys_ni_syscall (and if there are no >> callers of ia64_ni_syscall left, delete it). Want to send a >> patch? Actually, in the interest of keeping the patch small, it's better to remove the printk message in ia64_ni_syscall() for 2.6.0 and then we can do the proper cleanup for 2.6.1. --david - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Wed Nov 19 16:36:02 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:20 EST