Re: Inefficient TLB flushing

From: David S. Miller <davem_at_redhat.com>
Date: 2003-11-13 14:56:01
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 14:01:19 -0600
Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com> wrote:

> --- /usr/tmp/TmpDir.19957-0/linux/mm/memory.c_1.79	Wed Nov 12 13:56:25 2003
> +++ linux/mm/memory.c	Wed Nov 12 12:57:25 2003
> @@ -574,9 +574,10 @@
>  			if ((long)zap_bytes > 0)
>  				continue;
>  			if (need_resched()) {
> +				int fullmm = (*tlbp)->fullmm;
>  				tlb_finish_mmu(*tlbp, tlb_start, start);
>  				cond_resched_lock(&mm->page_table_lock);
> -				*tlbp = tlb_gather_mmu(mm, 0);
> +				*tlbp = tlb_gather_mmu(mm, fullmm);
>  				tlb_start_valid = 0;
>  			}
>  			zap_bytes = ZAP_BLOCK_SIZE;

This patch looks perfectly fine, good analysis.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Wed Nov 12 23:01:09 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:20 EST