RE: discontig patch question

From: Van Maren, Kevin <>
Date: 2003-11-11 05:34:47
> Yeah, but 1UL<<MAX_ORDER will always be page aligned, right?


But page alignment isn't the question: it is already aligned to
the 16MB or 64MB granules.

But you are saying that the address doesn't have to be as strict:
even if allocating 2^MAX_ORDER _pages_, the start doesn't have to
be aligned at a natural (PAGE_SIZE<<MAX_ORDER) boundary, and that
we can change the ORDERROUNDDOWN to not be as aggressive.

But then it also makes sense to have a smaller MAX_ORDER when not
using 4GB hugepages?  I'm happy with <= 256MB hugepages with 16GB ram,
so I guess I'd rather MAX_ORDER was normally smaller, and increased
only with very large hugepage pages.

Kevin Van Maren
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Received on Mon Nov 10 13:35:13 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:20 EST