Re: IA64 ino_t incorrectly sized?

From: Christoph Hellwig <>
Date: 2003-10-15 22:54:53
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 11:25:04AM +1000, Nathan Scott wrote:
> I'd appreciate any suggestions about a cleaner way to do the
> common types.h and nfsd/syscall.h header changes.

First question:  What about other LP64 arches besides IA64.  IMHO
having differen't ino_t on different LP64 arches is a rather bad idea.

AQnd if we go the ino_t is unsigned long route for all 64bit arches
the ifdefs would also magically disappear..

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Received on Wed Oct 15 09:08:00 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:19 EST