Re: IA64 ino_t incorrectly sized?

From: Andrew Morton <>
Date: 2003-10-15 16:28:33
Nathan Scott <> wrote:
>  One alternate approach would be to introduce __kernel_ustatino_t
>  and __kernel_nfsdino_t into every architecture's posix_types.h
>  (defining them as __kernel_ino_t everywhere but IA64, where they
>  would be unsigned int).  This would do away with any conditional
>  code in headers, but I'm not sure its the right approach at this
>  stage?

Sounds overly elaborate to me.  The patch which you had looked liveable-with.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Received on Wed Oct 15 02:25:30 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:19 EST