Re: GENERIC still failing?

From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes_at_sgi.com>
Date: 2003-10-15 10:22:05
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 05:12:17PM -0700, jbarnes wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 05:05:14PM -0700, David Mosberger wrote:
> > According to this page:
> > 
> > 	http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/kerncomp/
> > 
> > GENERIC builds are still failing:
> > 
> >   gcc -Wp,-MD,fs/ext2/.balloc.o.d -nostdinc -iwithprefix include -D__KERNEL__ -Iinclude   -D__KERNEL__ -Iinclude   -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -pipe  -ffixed-r13 -mfixed-range=f12-f15,f32-f127 -falign-functions=32 -frename-registers -fomit-frame-pointer    -mconstant-gp -DKBUILD_BASENAME=balloc -DKBUILD_MODNAME=ext2 -c -o fs/ext2/balloc.o fs/ext2/balloc.c
> > arch/ia64/sn/kernel/setup.c:94: error: `MAX_PHYSNODE_ID' undeclared here (not in a function)
> > arch/ia64/sn/kernel/setup.c:94: error: conflicting types for `physical_node_map'
> > include/asm/sn/sn_cpuid.h:126: error: previous declaration of `physical_node_map'
> > 
> > Anybody care to send me a fix for this?

Looks like CONFIG_NUMA and CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM are missing from the
config being built.  A generic kernel won't work without them.

Jesse
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Tue Oct 14 20:22:20 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:19 EST