Re: [PATCH 2.6.0test5: 2 of 3] MCA/TLB recovery

From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes_at_sgi.com>
Date: 2003-10-09 08:45:16
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 03:39:45PM -0700, David Mosberger wrote:
> >>>>> On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 14:44:04 -0700, "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> said:
> 
>   Tony> Any comments on parts 1 & 3???
> 
> I'm still catching up with my mail backlog, so I didn't have time to
> look at it very carefully, but from what I saw, they looked fine to
> me.  The big issue now, of course, is that Linus wants to be in
> bug-fix-only, so the cosmetic fixes would have to be removed from the
> patch before I can accept it.

Really, even for ia64 code?  Does that mean all the changes I've
recently pushed you will be dropped?  What about the fix for
CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM + CONFIG_VIRTUAL_MEM_MAP that I've been working so
hard to clean up?

Thanks,
Jesse
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Wed Oct 8 18:47:24 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:19 EST