Re: [PATCH 2.6.0test5: 2 of 3] MCA/TLB recovery

From: David Mosberger <davidm_at_napali.hpl.hp.com>
Date: 2003-10-09 06:51:19
>>>>> On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 16:27:25 -0700, "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> said:

  Tony> This part is just a clean-up of the logging code to only
  Tony> print registers that are implemented (instead of blindly
  Tony> dumping CR[0] ... CR[127] and AR[0] ... AR[127].

  Tony> +/* Bitmasks of implemented registers */
  Tony> +static u64 arbits[2] = { 0x11117f2f00ffUL, 0x7UL };
  Tony> +static u64 crbits[2] = { 0x3fb0107UL, 0x307ffUL };

Shouldn't these masks be obtained from PAL?

  Tony> +static u64 brbits[1] = { 0xffUL };
  Tony> +static u64 rrbits[1] = { 0xffUL };

These look a bit weird to me (since they're architected), but I guess
it's your call...

	--david
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Wed Oct 8 16:55:56 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:19 EST