Re: [PATCH] kill two dead headers

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch_at_lst.de>
Date: 2003-10-08 23:15:27
> It is also complicated, too complicated.  We at SGI are addressing
> the issues that Christoph raises and more.

You are not.  You're ignoring suggestions and calling me names
after patches.  Jesse and Jes are doing nice work OTOH but you
are in the way of fixing the total mess up.

> 1.  It's already been done.  Many of the patches that Christoph submitted
> have been taken care of here at SGI, but the code hasn't been pushed
> out to 2.6.  Some of Christoph's patches in this category are incomplete.
> Some of the code he deleted performs a necessary function and his
> patches result in panic's.

That's why they are sent to a public list.  If one of the patches is
wrong please follow up to the patch and explain why.

> It would simplify our lives enormously if none of these patches were applied, with the possible
> exception of the last two.  They're pretty much stomping all over work already in progress or
> introducing bugs that we don't really have the time or resources to track down and fix.

So submit your patches.  Jesse ACKed most of these and said he's waiting
for your group for more feedback.  This didn't happen for more than a
month so I've send them to a public list.  Seems like this is the only
way to get more feedback from you than insults.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Wed Oct 8 09:19:21 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:19 EST