Re: [PATCH] kill two dead headers

From: Alan Mayer <ajm_at_sgi.com>
Date: 2003-10-08 07:20:51
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Sam Ravnborg wrote:

Yup.  That was one of the things we're working to correct.

		--ajm

> 
> Reading the above it occurs to me you are aiming for "flag-day patches".
> Try to keep in sync with main-line instead is a *much* better approach.
> If you are having troubles getting your patches applied, maybe it's
> due to the size anyway.
> See how Martin does it for S390 for example. 5-20 paches each 3 weeks in
> average. And he gets good feedback - also from others than hch.
> Developing everything in vacuum is the wrong approach, and does not
> give you any feedback from the community - or at least you get it
> only indirect with patches that hch creates.
> 
> 	Sam
> 

Somebody just stopped callin' you "Angel."
--
Alan J. Mayer
SGI
ajm@sgi.com
WORK: 651-683-3131
HOME: 651-407-0134
--

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Tue Oct 7 17:26:59 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:19 EST