Re: [PATCH] kill two dead headers

From: Sam Ravnborg <sam_at_ravnborg.org>
Date: 2003-10-08 06:46:32
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 11:44:49AM -0500, Alan Mayer wrote:
> 
> It would simplify our lives enormously if none of these patches were applied, with the possible
> exception of the last two.  They're pretty much stomping all over work already in progress or
> introducing bugs that we don't really have the time or resources to track down and fix.

Reading the above it occurs to me you are aiming for "flag-day patches".
Try to keep in sync with main-line instead is a *much* better approach.
If you are having troubles getting your patches applied, maybe it's
due to the size anyway.
See how Martin does it for S390 for example. 5-20 paches each 3 weeks in
average. And he gets good feedback - also from others than hch.
Developing everything in vacuum is the wrong approach, and does not
give you any feedback from the community - or at least you get it
only indirect with patches that hch creates.

	Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Tue Oct 7 16:47:55 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:19 EST