David Mosberger wrote: > >>>>> On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 09:43:55 -0500, Mario Smarduch <cms063@email.mot.com> said: > > Mario> Some work I'm doing has taken me to the vhpt_miss > Mario> handler. I've been looking at the following snippet just > Mario> wondering what happens in the case where the present bit is 0 > Mario> and p10,p11 predicates are not set anotherwords they retain > Mario> their application values. Would this not cause an errant > Mario> insertion if either p10 or p11 were true in the application > Mario> prior to the VHPT handler? > > Mario> (p7) tbit.nz.unc p10,p11=r19,32 > > Did you miss the .unc qualifier on that instruction? It causes p10 and > p11 to be set to FALSE when p7 is FALSE. > > --david I see! I guess I didn't fully understand what Keith wrote. - Mario. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Fri Sep 26 12:57:13 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:18 EST