Paul Jackson wrote: >>It's meant to flatten the hierarchy ... >> ... >>The hierarchy is meant to be there, just ... >> >> > > >_What_ is meant to flatten the hierarchy ?? To what does "It" refer ?? > >So is the hierarchy of CKRM there or not -- you've confused me. > >And in any case, are we in agreement that any such CKRM hierarchy >is not isomorphic to the cpuset hierarchy? > > > No hierarchy in CKRM (as of now). IHMO even if we introduce a hierarchies in CKRM, I don't see that they are isomorphic to cpuset hiearchies. -- Hubertus Franke ( CKRM team ) c - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Thu Sep 25 09:28:25 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:17 EST