Re: [Lse-tech] Re: CPUSET Proposal

From: Hubertus Franke <frankeh_at_watson.ibm.com>
Date: 2003-09-25 23:21:39
Paul Jackson wrote:

>>It's meant to flatten the hierarchy ...
>> ...
>>The hierarchy is meant to be there, just ...
>>    
>>
>
>
>_What_ is meant to flatten the hierarchy ??  To what does "It" refer ??
>
>So is the hierarchy of CKRM there or not -- you've confused me.
>
>And in any case, are we in agreement that any such CKRM hierarchy
>is not isomorphic to the cpuset hierarchy?
>
>  
>
No hierarchy in CKRM  (as of now).

IHMO     even if we introduce a hierarchies in CKRM, I don't see that 
they are isomorphic to cpuset
hiearchies.

-- Hubertus Franke ( CKRM team )      c

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Thu Sep 25 09:28:25 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:17 EST