On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 02:01:03PM -0700, David Mosberger wrote: > >>>>> On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 13:31:15 -0700, jbarnes@sgi.com (Jesse Barnes) said: > > >> I'm sorry, but until some of these criteria are met, there is no > >> way I'm going to apply this patch. As for the breakage: as far > >> as I can see, the patch moves the bootmem initialization back to > >> the old place, which means that drivers/acpi/tables.c will fail > >> to allocate memory for the SDT again. > > Jesse> Len Brown already took the change to fix tables.c. > > Perhaps I'm missing something, but I see this in Linus' tree: > > Age Author Rev Comments > 7 weeks len.brown 1.15 match 2.4 -- more info in RSDT, nix some build warnings > 11 weeks agrover 1.14 ACPI: Dynamically allocate SDT list (suggested by Andi Kleen) > > No SDT fixes are far as I can see. See http://linux-acpi.bkbits.net:8080/linux-acpi-test-2.6.0/cset@1.1323.1.3?nav=index.html|ChangeSet@-4d. It'll be part of Len's next push. Sorry I should have kept that in the patch so as not to confuse people. I've been working hard to get all of the non-ia64 specific code out into Linus' tree already, including some bootmem allocator fixes and such, this one just took a little longer because Andy stepped down as maintainer at around the same time I sent my (trivial) patch out to fix this. Btw, which piece(s) of the patch would you like first? Is seperating the contig and discontig functions into seperate files worthwhile? I can comment things a bit more too while I'm at it... Thanks, Jesse - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Mon Sep 22 17:07:59 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:17 EST