Re: Inefficient ia64 system call implementation in glibc

From: Andreas Schwab <schwab_at_suse.de>
Date: 2003-09-20 23:01:26
"Jim Hull" <jim.hull@hp.com> writes:

> But my real issue with the performance of this code is not with
> sign-extend or the scheduling these instructions, it's with the break
> instruction.  I may be mistaken, but hasn't it been many months since
> David Mosberger implemented all the kernel infrastructure needed to
> support syscalls using the epc instruction?

It's only implemented in 2.6 so far.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Sat Sep 20 09:01:44 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:17 EST