On Thursday 18 September 2003 21:59, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On second thought, here's the output from a test machine here. I think > it's working correctly. > > ... > ACPI 2.0 SLIT locality table: > 010 020 022 042 > 020 010 042 022 > 022 042 010 020 > 042 022 020 010 That unsymmetric??? Interesting... Of course this saves you the headache of explicitely round-robin. > Which I think you were worried about? I'm still worried about the "normal" kind of machines with more symmetric node-distances. TX-7 for example has 10 15 15 15 20 20 20 20 15 10 15 15 20 20 20 20 15 15 10 15 20 20 20 20 15 15 15 10 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 10 15 15 15 20 20 20 20 15 10 15 15 20 20 20 20 15 15 10 15 20 20 20 20 15 15 15 10 I'm fine with sorting if we get some sort of round-robin at least over the first off-diagonal node level. But the code I've sent you was the best idea I had (in the limited time I could spend for this...). Regards, Erich - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Fri Sep 19 13:01:00 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:17 EST