Try again. It looks like the tree should be back to normal. --david >>>>> On Mon, 23 Jun 2003 15:43:05 -0700, "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> said: Tony> I did a "bk pull" from Tony> http://lia64.bkbits.net:8080/linux-ia64-2.5 Tony> a few minutes ago, and was surprised when BitKeeper complained Tony> about lots of merge collisions (the bk tree into which I Tony> pulled hasn't even had a "bk edit" run in it, let alone any Tony> changes checked in). Tony> Since I'm a neophyte at BK, I tried my usual fix (remove the Tony> whole tree, and run "bk clone" again). This succeeded without Tony> any reported errors, but time seems to have gone Tony> backwards. The tree I now see is missing some stuff that was Tony> checked into 2.5.72 (e.g fixes to include/asm-ia64/mca.h and Tony> arch/ia64/kernel/mca.h for cleaner handling of INIT events). Tony> The Web interface to BK says the newest changeset in this tree Tony> was applied 5 weeks ago. Tony> -Tony - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line Tony> "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to Tony> majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at Tony> http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Mon Jun 23 19:14:20 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:15 EST