On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 07:00:28PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 01:05:17PM -0400, Martin Hicks wrote: > > I think that this patch is still worth including, just so that > > early printk works for GENERIC, although with a slight increase in > > internal complexity. > > I'd prefer to see the readb() et al calls move out of the machvec. Is > there really no better way to work around this hardware braindamage? No, unfortunately. But then inX/outX and readX aren't expected to be very fast anyway. JesseReceived on Tue Jun 03 11:12:29 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:15 EST