I applied this unwind patch for 2.4. Thanks! On Friday 30 May 2003 10:03 pm, Keith Owens wrote: > On Fri, 30 May 2003 18:16:19 -0700, > David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com> wrote: > >>>>>> On Wed, 28 May 2003 17:17:24 +1000, Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au> said: > > > > Keith> arch/ia64/kernel/unwind.c: Only call get_scratch_regs() when > > Keith> pt is really needed. The premature calls to > > Keith> get_scratch_regs() would pick up the wrong address for pt if > > Keith> the register was in switch_stack and pt_regs had not been > > Keith> reached yet, e.g. unw_access_ar(&info, UNW_AR_BSPSTORE,...) > > Keith> before pt_regs had been reached. > > > >This looks fine to me. Can you send me a 2.5 patch? > > 2.5 only requires the pt_regs changes. First patch is against > 2.5.69-ia64-030521, second does the same thing against 2.5.69 ia64 > cset-1.1042.1.187-to-1.1102. > > Bjorn, there are several minor differences between the 2.5.69 version > of unwind.c and 2.4.21-rc2-ia64-cset-1.1116.2.93-to-1.1129, AFAICT > there is no reason for the differences. The 2.5.69 version of unwind.c > plus the first patch below can drop straight into 2.4, replacing the > patch I sent against cset-1129. The cset 2.5.69 1.1102 version is not > compatible with 2.4 kernels.Received on Tue Jun 03 08:56:41 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:15 EST