Re: [Linux-ia64] High fpu register corruption (PATCH)

From: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn_helgaas_at_hp.com>
Date: 2003-05-29 14:25:37
> Which tree are you looking at? to-linus-2.5 or linux-ia64-2.5?  I have
> gotten quite lazy in pushing the former, since the only reason now to
> do a push there is when I want Linus to do a pull.  The latter tree is
> much more active.

The latter (linux-ia64-2.5).  But ... argh!  I've been doing "bk changes -R"
to watch for your updates, and saw none.  BUT, I just did a "bk pull"
and got a lot of them.

OK, ignore my questions about ptrace.c and setup.c.  Questions still
open:

arch/ia64/kernel/signal.c:
        restore_sigcontext() changes look equivalent, but have
        gratuitous differences from 2.5 (reversed sense of test,
        comment)

arch/ia64/kernel/traps.c:
        Gratuitous whitespace differences.

include/asm-ia64/processor.h:
        ia64_is_local_fpu_owner(), ia64_set_local_fpu_owner():
        these look functionally equivalent in 2.4 and 2.5.
        Can they be made identical?

include/asm-ia64/system.h:
        IA64_HAS_EXTRA_STATE() and switch_to() appear to be
        identical in 2.4 and 2.5 except for whitespace changes.
        Can they be made identical?

Bjorn
Received on Wed May 28 21:25:47 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:15 EST