On Sat, 2003-05-17 at 16:09, Russell King wrote: > On Sat, May 17, 2003 at 01:36:01PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > > How would you feel about making this API change? > > No problem. > > > I take it you have a preference for using _to_cpu and _to_device > > call variants? > > Thinking about it some, these could be confused with the direction of > DMA. > > Would "dma_sync_for_device" and "dma_sync_for_cpu" fit better? That's still a bit ambiguous. I suppose dma_sync_ownership_to_device etc. would be descriptive but too cumbersome...? JamesReceived on Sun May 18 08:54:43 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:14 EST