From: Grant Grundler <iod00d@hp.com> Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 21:26:10 -0700 On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 04:40:25PM -0700, Jeremy Higdon wrote: > - /* pci_alloc_consistent gives only non-DAC addresses */ > - test_desc.addr_hi = 0; > + test_desc.addr_hi = ((u64) buf_dma >> 32); > test_desc.addr_lo = buf_dma & 0xffffffff; Just curious, is the "& 0xffffffff" really necessary? I was expecting "(u32) buf_dma" to be sufficient. Not necessary, just a stylistic choice.Received on Fri May 16 21:35:32 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:14 EST