Re: [Linux-ia64] Re: 64 Bits DMA Addresses for Alloc Consistent Interfaces.

From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley_at_HansenPartnership.com>
Date: 2003-05-17 04:29:53

On Fri, 2003-05-16 at 13:18, Russell King wrote:
> Your suggestion seems to add in two extra sync calls (and thus extra code
> in the common case.)

Yes, sorry, needlessly complex example.

James

Received on Fri May 16 11:31:03 2003

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: David Mosberger: "Re: [Linux-ia64] Re: [BK PATCH] SN update"
Previous message: Grant Grundler: "[Linux-ia64] Re: 64 Bits DMA Addresses for Alloc Consistent Interfaces."
In reply to: Russell King: "Re: [Linux-ia64] Re: 64 Bits DMA Addresses for Alloc Consistent Interfaces."
Next in thread: James Bottomley: "Re: [Linux-ia64] Re: 64 Bits DMA Addresses for Alloc Consistent Interfaces."

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:14 EST