Re: [Linux-ia64] Re: [BK PATCH] SN update

From: Jesse Barnes <>
Date: 2003-05-17 04:20:02
On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 10:49:58AM -0700, David Mosberger wrote:
> >>>>> On Fri, 16 May 2003 08:09:01 -0400, Martin Hicks <> said:
>   Martin> On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 11:37:00PM -0700, David Mosberger
>   Martin> wrote:
>   >> [Forgot to cc the list.]
>   >> 
>   Jesse> Ok, this is my first 'bksend' cset, so please let me know if
>   Jesse> you need something different.
>   >>  Please don't do that.  Either send regular patches or point me
>   >> to a tree I can pull from (actually, I still need to learn how to
>   >> do this "safely").
>   Martin> I think it's "safe" to bk pull from anywhere.  There is
>   Martin> always bk unpull if you want to reverse the last pull.
> That's not safe in my mind.  What I'd like is an efficient way to
> preview a pull (see a diff -u between the remote tree and where I'm
> pulling into).  Note the "efficient" part.  Having to do a full clone
> first doesn't qualify.

I found myself wishing the same thing as I tried to get together a
patch for you.  I noticed that 'bk import' has a -C option which will
let you mess with the changeset before you commit it, but 'bk receive'
doesn't, AFAIK.  It would be nice if it did (or if it was easier to
modify an existing changeset).

Received on Fri May 16 11:20:06 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:14 EST