>>>>> On 15 May 2003 10:12:48 -0500, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> said: James> On Thu, 2003-05-15 at 10:06, David Mosberger wrote: >> James and I have been discussing this very point for the last >> week or so. My preferred solution is to add an explicit dma-mask >> argument to coherent/non-coherent allocators, but James prefers >> to do this via a new GFP flag (GFP_DMA32 or some such). James> This is still being hashed out. It looks like adding a the James> _mask variants may still be a viable runner for 2.6. That would be good. --davidReceived on Thu May 15 08:50:14 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-02 09:20:14 EST